<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ideation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idea.tion.to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idea.tion.to</link>
	<description>An agnostic blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 15:15:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Protologism: Ignomatic</title>
		<link>http://idea.tion.to/2011/09/protologism-ignomatic/</link>
		<comments>http://idea.tion.to/2011/09/protologism-ignomatic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Borg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Protologisms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idea.tion.to/?p=1883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ignomatic [adjective or adverb]: Description of a type of behaviour that is acquired by imitation, sustained by habit, with an origin to which the practitioner is perfectly oblivious.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://idea.tion.to/2011/09/protologism-ignomatic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Paradox of being a Moderate</title>
		<link>http://idea.tion.to/2011/09/the-paradox-of-being-a-moderate/</link>
		<comments>http://idea.tion.to/2011/09/the-paradox-of-being-a-moderate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 11:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Borg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundamentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idea.tion.to/?p=861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://idea.tion.to/2011/09/the-paradox-of-being-a-moderate/" target="_self"><img class="alignright" style="background:#FFFFFF;float:right" title="Was the Japanese earthquake a punishment from God?" src="/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/japanesegirl.jpg" alt="Was the Japanese earthquake a punishment from God?" width="90" height="70" /></a></p>
<p>In the days after the horrific Japanese earthquake in March 2011 an SMS circulated around in the Middle East claiming that it was an act of punishment from Allah for the wrongdoings of the Japanese people. If you, like me, are not a fundamentalist Muslim you will probably find that attitude morally repulsive. At the same time I would argue that it is a rational conclusion and that it presents profound challenges for moderate believers.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://idea.tion.to/2011/09/the-paradox-of-being-a-moderate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Censorship</title>
		<link>http://idea.tion.to/2011/02/on-censorship/</link>
		<comments>http://idea.tion.to/2011/02/on-censorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Borg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idea.tion.to/?p=1713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://idea.tion.to/2011/02/on-censorship/" target="_self"><img class="alignright" style="background:#FFFFFF;float:right" title="Index on Censorship" src="http://idea.tion.to/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/index.jpg" alt="Index on Censorship" width="90" height="71" /></a></p>
<p>Censorship is about concealment. I am exploring different motives for it, and argue that it is a fallacy to consider the state or corporation as a paternal person with rights like an individual. Granting leaders the power to decide what is real and what is not is giving them more power than any human can handle.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://idea.tion.to/2011/02/on-censorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Psychotic leadership &#8211; An inherent snag?</title>
		<link>http://idea.tion.to/2010/12/psychotic-leadership-an-inherent-snag/</link>
		<comments>http://idea.tion.to/2010/12/psychotic-leadership-an-inherent-snag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Borg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idea.tion.to/?p=1721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://idea.tion.to/2010/12/psychotic-leadership-an-inherent-snag/" target="_self"><img class="alignright" style="background:#FFFFFF;float:right" title="Psychotic leadership - An inherent snag?" src="/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Shrek06-LordFarquaad.jpg" alt="Psychotic leadership - An inherent snag?" width="90" height="71" /></a></p>
<p>What kind of people become political leaders? Is it even possible to be a normal decent person and arrive at the upper echelons of power, or is a modicum of callous insanity a prerequisite? Some reflections on Machiavelli´s Prince and Isaiah Berlin´s study of De Maistre.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://idea.tion.to/2010/12/psychotic-leadership-an-inherent-snag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Nice and Obedient Girl</title>
		<link>http://idea.tion.to/2010/08/a-nice-and-obedient-girl/</link>
		<comments>http://idea.tion.to/2010/08/a-nice-and-obedient-girl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Borg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human nature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idea.tion.to/?p=1670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://idea.tion.to/2010/08/a-nice-and-obedient-girl/" target="_self"><img class="alignright" style="background:#FFFFFF;float:right" title="A nice and obedient girl" src="/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/girl5.jpg" alt="A nice and obedient girl" width="90" height="70" /></a></p>
<p>Some people have a very dark view of man based on our cruel history of war. It is tempting to draw the conclusion that human nature is ferocious and evil, but I don´t think this view makes sense. The cruel and nasty people do not like to obey or listen to anyone. It´s the people that are nice but don´t think for themselves that follow orders.
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://idea.tion.to/2010/08/a-nice-and-obedient-girl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Philosophy is Fabulous Stuff</title>
		<link>http://idea.tion.to/2010/07/why-philosophy-is-fabulous-stuff/</link>
		<comments>http://idea.tion.to/2010/07/why-philosophy-is-fabulous-stuff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Borg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agnosticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncertainty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unpredictability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idea.tion.to/?p=1532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://idea.tion.to/2010/07/why-philosophy-is-fabulous-stuff/" target="_self"><img class="alignright" style="background:#FFFFFF;float:right" title="Why Philosophy is Fabulous Stuff" src="/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/deer.branicki.jpg" alt="Why Philosophy is Fabulous Stuff" width="90" height="70" /></a></p>
<p>From a fountain in the garden of comte Xavier Branicki's castle I would like to have another bash at convincing you why philosophy is good not only for the individual but also for society at large. I also defend why multiplicity, plurality and contrast within society is necessary to be prepared for the future.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://idea.tion.to/2010/07/why-philosophy-is-fabulous-stuff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cheese and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance</title>
		<link>http://idea.tion.to/2010/07/cheese-and-the-art-of-motorcycle-maintenance/</link>
		<comments>http://idea.tion.to/2010/07/cheese-and-the-art-of-motorcycle-maintenance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Borg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agnosticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idea.tion.to/?p=1527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://idea.tion.to/2010/07/cheese-and-the-art-of-motorcycle-maintenance/" target="_self"><img class="alignright" style="background:#FFFFFF;float:right" title="Cheese and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" src="/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/iplato.jpg" alt="Cheese and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" width="90" height="70" /></a></p>
<p>Is philosophy good for society? Are noble lies the justifiable medicine of philosophical doctors? If more people thought for themselves would society disintegrate? I’m on the road from Granada to Gothenburg, and today Plato is on my pillion.</p>
				]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://idea.tion.to/2010/07/cheese-and-the-art-of-motorcycle-maintenance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Validity</title>
		<link>http://idea.tion.to/2010/02/on-validity/</link>
		<comments>http://idea.tion.to/2010/02/on-validity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 14:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Borg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pragmatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reflexivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idea.tion.to/?p=1037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://idea.tion.to/2010/02/on-validity/" target="_self"><img class="alignright" style="background:#FFFFFF;float:right" title="Two Dimensional Epistemology" src="/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/vitality_thumb.jpg" alt="Two Dimensional Epistemology" width="90" height="77" /></a></p>
<p>What is a valid belief? What does it mean for a belief to be valid? How should we deal with beliefs that may not be valid? I am arguing that truth is not the most important decider of validity, but rather what practical implications a belief has for the believer. I am digging for a lost epistemological dimension, more fundamental than that of accurate representation of reality.</p>
				]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://idea.tion.to/2010/02/on-validity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Life Through Shifting Mirrors</title>
		<link>http://idea.tion.to/2009/10/life-through-shifting-mirrors/</link>
		<comments>http://idea.tion.to/2009/10/life-through-shifting-mirrors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Borg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C. G. Jung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Soros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reflexivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idea.tion.to/?p=1256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://idea.tion.to/2009/10/life-through-shifting-mirrors/" target="_self"><img class="alignright" style="background:#FFFFFF;float:right" title="Shifting Mirrors" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/whatdoesntkillmethmb.jpg" alt="Shifting Mirrors" width="90" height="57" /></a>What are we supposed to do? What is possible for us? Who are we? I am arguing that the way we search for answers may limit the possibilities we actually have and that there are inner and outer forces that want to make appear solid and fixed that which is in fact plastic and for us to create.</p>
				

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://idea.tion.to/2009/10/life-through-shifting-mirrors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Rules of the Game</title>
		<link>http://idea.tion.to/2009/08/the-rules-of-the-game/</link>
		<comments>http://idea.tion.to/2009/08/the-rules-of-the-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Borg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ontology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chaos Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Determinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws of Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonlinearity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Origin of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prigogine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quantum physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncertainty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unpredictability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idea.tion.to/?p=1081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://idea.tion.to/2009/08/the-rules-of-the-game/" target="_self"><img class="alignright" style="background:#FFFFFF;float:right" title="Fractal" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/fractal.jpg" alt="Fractal" width="90" height="75" /></a>In this first post in a series of four I am asking if we could turn back time would history play out the same way? Is it true that anything is possible? If we know the rules can we predict the future? I am finding some of the answers in quantum physics and chaos theory. </p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://idea.tion.to/2009/08/the-rules-of-the-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

